Noen setninger om Ungarn som ikke er oppmuntrende

With this supermajority, Fidesz won the power to change the constitution. They have used this power in the most extreme way at every turn, amending the constitution ten times in their first year in office and then enacting a wholly new constitution that will take effect on January 1, 2012.

This constitutional activity has transformed the legal landscape to remove checks on the power of the government and put virtually all power into the hands of the current governing party for the foreseeable future.

The new constitution has attracted a great deal of criticism from the Venice Commission for Democracy through Law of the Council of Europe, the European Parliament and the United States. But the Fidesz government has paid no attention.

En meget bra post om Ungarn fra Kim Lane Scheppele ved Princeton.

Hun fortsetter:

The government lowered the retirement age for judges from 70 to 62, giving judges only a few months to adjust to their new futures.

National Judicial Office with a single person at the helm who has the power to replace the retiring judges and to name future judges. This person also has the power to move any sitting judge to a different court.

But the new districts are drawn in such a way that no other party on the political horizon besides Fidesz is likely to win elections.

From here on, all tax and fiscal policy must be decided by a two-thirds supermajority. Even the precise boundaries of electoral districts cannot be changed by simple majority vote, but only by a two-third supermajority. If a new government gets a mere majority, policies instituted during the Fidesz government cannot be changed.

Les hele her.

Merket med
%d bloggers like this: